Public Awareness towards Sustainable Transportation in Shah Alam, Malaysia
Keywords:Sustainable vehicles, environmental awareness, travel behaviour
This paper studied the awareness of an urban population to use sustainable vehicles and their readiness to reduce car usage. Data were collected through a survey of 384 vehicle users in Shah Alam, Selangor. Results suggested that the majority were not ready to consider cycling and walking as alternatives. About to environmental awareness, the majority showed their awareness of the dangers of motor vehicles towards the environment. However, they refused to use more sustainable mode oftravelling. Among other reasons provided as “refusal” regarding of sustainable vehicles,applicationwas hot weather, surrounding safety factor and inefficient public transport services.
Keywords: Sustainable vehicles; environmental awareness, travel behaviour
eISSN 2398-4295 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
Anable, J., (2005). ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12 (1), 65–78.
Curtis, C & T. Perkins, (2006). Travel Behaviour: A Review Of Recent Literature, Impacts of Transit Led Development in a New Rail Corridor, Perth. Department of Urban and Regional Planning Curtin University.
Garling, T., Gillholm, R., E.Garling, A., (1998). Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research. Transportation, 25, 129–146.
Hagman, O., (2003). Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users’ constructions of the goods and bads of car use. Transportation Research Part D, 8(1), 1–9.
Handy, S., Weston, L., Mokhtarian, P.L., (2005). Driving by choice or necessity? Transportation Research Part A, 39(2–3), 183–203.
Hiscock, R., Macintyre, S., Kearns, A., Ellaway, A., (2002). Means of transport and Ontological security: do cars provide psycho-social benefits to their users? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(2), 119–135.
Nasrudin, N., Nor, A.R.M., Noor, H.M., Abdullah, Y.A,(2013). Urban Residents’ Awareness and Readiness for Sustainable Transportation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 105, 632–643.
Nasrudin, N., Rostam, K., Noor, H.M.(2014) Barriers and Motivations for Sustainable Travel Behaviour: Shah Alam Residents’ Perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 153, 510–519.
Nilsson, M., Kuller, R., (2000). Travel behavior and environmental concern. Transportation Research Part D, 5, 211–234.
Polk, M. ,(2003). Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transportation system in Sweden? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8(2), 75-95.
Polk, M., (2004). The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, (12 ), 185–195.
Shokoohi R., Hanif N.R., Md Dali M. (2011). Children Walking to and from School in Tehran: Asociations with neighbourhood safety, parental concerns and children’s perceptions. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 2(4).
Stern, P., (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3), 407–424.
Tertoolen, G., Van Kreveld, D., Verstraten, B., (1998). Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transportation Research Part A, 32(3), 171–181.
Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R., Van Lange, P., (1995). Car verses public transportation. The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 258–278.
Van Liere, Kent and Riley Dunlap ,(1981).Environmental concern: does it make a difference how it's measured?, Environment and Behaviour, 13.