Exploiting Resources for Competitive Advantage of Cooperative Organizations in Malaysia

Authors

  • Rohana Othman Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia.
  • Roshayani Arshad Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia
  • Nooraslinda Abdul Aris Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia.
  • Siti Maznah Mohd Arif Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i12.124

Keywords:

Physical Resources, Cooperatives, Resource-based view (RBV) theory, Sustainability

Abstract

Outstanding business performance and sustainable competitive advantage depend critically on tangible organizational resources, looking from the Resource-based view theory (Galbreath, 2004; Fahy, 2002). Lippman and Rumelt (2003) opined firms’ assets (physical or financial) hold the potential to create peak value for competitive advantage, relatively free from the threat of being replicated.  Firms are able to thwart threats by focusing on identifying and exploiting resources. This paper investigates the influence of organization’s tangible resources on cooperative's success. Content analyses of annual reports of Malaysian cooperatives testify tangible internal resources are a viable business strategy for sustained competitive advantage positively impacting performance.

Keywords: Physical Resources, Cooperatives, Resource-based view (RBV) theory, Sustainability

eISSN 2398-4295 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. 

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.

Almarri,K. and Gardiner, P. (2014). Application of resource-based view to project management research: supporter and opponents. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 119, p.437-445.

Greco, M. Cricelli, L. & Grimaldi, M. (2013). A strategic management framework of tangible and intangible assets. European Management Journal, 31, 55–66.

Chiu, Y. C., & Liaw, Y. C. (2009). Organizational slack: is more or less better?. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(3), 321-342.

Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. The Journal of Marketing, 37-52.

Fahy, J. (2002). A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. International Business Review, 11(1), 57-78.

Foss, N. J. (Ed.). (1997). Resources, firms, and strategies: a reader in the resource-based perspective. Oxford University Press.

Galbreath, J. (2005). Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9), 979-987.

Galbreath, J. T. (2004). Determinants of Firm Success: A Resource-based Analysis. Curtin University of Technology.

Grant R.M (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis; concept, technique, applications (4th ED). Mssachusetts: Blackwell

Inmyxai, S., & Takahashi, Y. (2010). The effect of firm resources on business performance of male-and female-headed firms in the case of Lao micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). International Journal of Business and Information, 5(1), 63-90.

Kazozcu, S.B. (2011). Role of strategic flexibility in the choice of turnaround strategies: A resource based approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 24, p.444-459.

Lee, C. Lee, K. Pennings, J.M. (2001). Internal Capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 22, issues 6-7. P.615-640.

Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Fotiadis, T. A., & Zeriti, A. (2013). Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance. Tourism Management, 35, 94-110.

Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (2003). A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1069-1086.

Meutia and Ismail, T. (2012). The Development of Entrepreneurial Social Competence And Business Network to Improve Competitive Advantage And Business Performance of Small Medium Sized Enterprises: A Case Study of Batik Industry In Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 46 – 51.

MDTC (2010). The National Cooperative Policy 2011-2020 [pdf]. Retrieved from http:// http://www.skm.gov.my/Gerakan-Koperasi/Dasar-Koperasi-Negara-2011-2020.aspx

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

Published

2018-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles