Ageing in Place or Late Life Move?. The Malaysian elderly generation housing options

Authors

  • Hafiszah Ismail Centre of Studies for Estate Management, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Faridah Muhamad Halil Centre of Studies for Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Aida Wati Zainan Abidin Centre of Studies for Statistical and Decision Science, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Sufian Hasim Centre of Studies for Building Surveying, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v5i18.185

Keywords:

Ageing in Place, Generations, Elderly (Senior) housing, Residential Environment Preferences

Abstract

The elderly generation is distinctive, and this reflects their housing preferences. This study aims to offer an outline of the Malaysian generational elderly housing preferences. The main objectives of this study; (i) To define elderly; (ii) To classify the features of elderly housing preferences; and (iii) To ascertain the elderly housing preferences by generations. This study applies mixed-method strategy and shown; (i) Health; (ii) Safety; (iii) Convenience; (iv) Community; and (v) Amenity as the preferred elderly housing features. This study guides the main actors of property development on the preferred elderly housing by the Malaysian generations.Keywords: Ageing in Place; Generations, Elderly (Senior) housing; Residential Environment PreferenceseISSN 2398-4295 ©2020 The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v5i18.185

References

Ambigga, K. S., Ramli, A. S., Suthahar, A., Tauhid, N., Clearihan, L., Browning, C. (2011). Bridging the gap in ageing: Translating policies into practice in Malaysian Primary Care. Asia Pacific Family Medicine. 10:2, pp. 1-7. http://www.apfmj.com/content/10/1/2

Amiri, M. (2018). Problems Faced by Old Age People. The International Journal of Indian Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 52-62

Bloom, D.E., Canning, D. and Fink, G. (2011), “Implications of population ageing for economic growth”, available at: www.nber.org/papers/w16705.pdf?new_window¼1

Boumeester, H. J. F. M. (2011). Traditional Housing Demand Research. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9

Chalise, H. 2010. Social support and its co-relation with loneliness: a cross-cultural study of Nepales older adults. Aging and Human Development, Vol. 71(2) 115-138, 2010

Clark, W. A. V., and S. Davies. 1990. “Elderly Mobility and Mobility Outcomes.” Research on Aging 12 (4): 430–462. doi:10.1177/0164027590124004

Clough, R., M. Leamy, V. Miller, and L. Bright. 2004. Housing Decisions in Later Life. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano, Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., M. Haak, A. Fänge, and S. Iwarsson. 2007. “The Multiple Meaning of Home as Experienced by Very Old Swedish People.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 14 (1): 25–32. doi:10.1080/11038120601151714.

De Jong, P., J. Rouwendal, P. Van Hattum, and A. Brouwer. 2012. “Housing Preferences of an Ageing Population.” Investigation in the Diversity among Dutch Older Adults. Netspar Discussion Paper No. 07/2012-024. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2120458 or http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.2120458.

Dupuis, A., and C. D. Thorns. 1996. “Meanings of Home for Older Homeowners.” Housing Studies 11 (4): 485–501. doi:10.1080/02673039608720871

Ekerdt. D. J., Sergeant, J. F. (2008).Motives For Residential Mobility In Later Life Post-Move Perspectives Of Elders And Family Members. International Journal Of Human Development. Vol.66(2).Pp.131-154. Doi: 10.2190/Ag.66.2.C

Friedrich, K. and Warnes, A.M. (2000) ‘Understanding contrasts in later life migration patterns: Germany, Britain and the United States’, Erdkunde, Vol.54, pp. 108-20

Gardner, P. J. (2011). Natural neighborhood networks: important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 263–271. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.007

Gibler, K. M., Casado-Diaz M.A., Rodriguez, V. And Taltavull P. (2009). Late life second move housing choices of international retiree migrants. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis. Vol.2, No.2. pp190-210

Henilane. I., (2016). Housing Concept And Analysis Of Housing Classification. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management. ISSN: 2255-9671, Vol. 4, pp.168–179.

Ismail, H., Aziz, F. & Wahab, A. M. (2019). The Elderly (Senior) Housing Options Preferences Among Malaysian Generations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. ICCRMBEE2019. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012039 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755 1315/385/1/012039

Ismail, H., Shaari, M. S. (2019). Housing decision: the choice between location, house and neighbourhood among malaysian generations. MATEC Web of Conferences 266 (6) (2019):01026. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201926601026

Kramer, C., and C. Pfaffenbach. 2009. “Persistence Preferred-On Future Residential (Im)Mobility among the Generation 50plus.” Erdkunde 63 (2): 161–172. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2009.02.04.

Läidmäe, V., Tammsaar, K., Tulva, T. & Kasepalu. 2012. Quality of Life of Elderly in Estonia. The Internet Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology. Vol 7. No 1, 2012

Lim, C. K. (2012). The changing needs of older Malaysians: a Selangor case study.(Doctoral dissertation, Adelaide: University of Adelaide).

Litwak, E. and Longino, C.F. Jr (1987), ‘Migration patterns among the elderly: a developmental perspective”, Gerontologist, Vol.27, No.3, pp. 266-72.

Longino, C.F. Jr, Jackson, D.A., Zimmerman, R .S. and Bradsher, J. E. (1991). The second move: health and geographic mobility’. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, Vol. 46, pp. 191-213

Mathews, W.J. (2007) ‘Housing the Aging Baby Boomer Generation: Implications for Georgia Communities’. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia’s Aging Population: What to Expect and How to Cope Conference. September 26, 2007. Georgia State University, Atlanta.

Minichiello, V., Coulson, I. (2006). Contemporary issues in gerontology: promoting positive ageing. Sydney: Allen and Unwin

Mohd Tobi, S. U., Fathi, M. S., Amaratunga, D. (2017). Ageing in Place, an overview for the Elderly in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings 1891, 020101 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005434

Ong, F. S. (2001). Ageing in Malaysia: a review of national policies and programmes. Ageing and Long Term Care: The International Development Research Centre (IRDC).

Oswald, F., and H. W. Wahl. 2005. “Dimensions of the Meaning of Home in Later Life.” In Home and Identity in Later Life. International perspectives, edited by G. D. Rowles and H. Chaudhury, 21–46, New York: Springer

Phillips D.R and Chan A.C.M (2002), Ageing and Long Term Care, National Policies in the Asia Pacific. Asia Pacific Institute of Ageing Studies. Hong Kong.

Poi, P. J. H., Forsyth, D. R., Chan, D. K. Y. (2004). Services for older people in Malaysia: issues and challenges. Age and Ageing Journal, 33:444-6.

Sixsmith, A. J. 1990. “The Meaning and Experience of Home in Later Life.” In Welfare and the Ageing Experience, edited by B. Bytheway and J. Johnson, 172–192. Aldershot: Avebury.

Speare, A. and Meyer, J.W. (1988) ‘Types of elderly residential mobility and their determinants’. Journal of Gerontology, Vol.43, No.3, pp.S74-81

Vasara, P. 2015. “Not Ageing in Place: Negotiating Meanings of Residency in Age-Related Housing.” Journal of Aging Studies 35: 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2015.07.004.

Wang, D., & Li, S. (2006). Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China, 30, 305–326. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.02.009

Warnes, A.M. (1992a) ‘Age-related variation and temporal change in elderly migration’, in Rogers, A. (Ed.), Elderly Migration and Population Redistribution: Comparative Study, Belhaven, London, pp.35-55

Weil, J. and Smith, E. (2016). Revaluating aging in place: from traditional definitions to the continuum of care. Working with Older People, Vol. 20 Issue: 4, pp.223-230

Wong, C. N. (2010): Policy response for the aging in Malaysia. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research; 2010 [http://www.mof.go.jp/jouhou/soken/kenkyu/ h18/s2_02.pdf]

World Health Organization (2011). Global Health and Ageing. www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/global_health_and_aging.pdf

World Health Organization (2017) Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health https://www.WorldHealthOrganization.int/ageing/global-strategy/en/.

World Health Organization (WHO) (2007), Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide, Geneva, Switzerland, available at: www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_ Guide_English.pdf

World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

Published

2020-04-11

Issue

Section

Articles