Measuring Effectiveness of Planning and Control
The current planning mechanisms which are development plan and planning control were recognised as important tools in housing planning process. However, the weaknesses involved in the preparation of development plans and its implementation through development control may impose constraints on housing development. The objective of this paper is to evaluate whether the housing planning and control activities practiced require improvement in terms of the level of effectiveness of its implementation by the LPAs and PCs in Selangor using Quadrant Analysis. It was found that three activities; location, compliance and difficulties need high attention to achieve effective housing planning.
2398-4295 © 2016. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK.. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
Keywords: Planning and Control Activities; Town Planners; Quadrant Analysis
Ahmad, F., Mohd, I., Maidin, S.L., Zainol, R., & Mohd Noor, N. (2013). Malaysian development plan system: Issues and problems, one decade after its reform (2001-2011). Journal of Malaysian Institute of Planners, 11, 1-20
Bakhtyar, B., Zaharim, A., Sopian, K., & Moghimi, S. (2013). Housing for poor people: a review on low- cost housing process in Malaysia.WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 9, 126-136
Ball, M. (2011). Planning delay and the responsiveness of English housing supply. Urban Studies.48 (2), 349 -362.
Burgess, G,.Monk, S. & Whitehead, C. (2010). How can the planning system deliver more housing?. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 1-8.
Chua, R.S., & Deguchi, A. (2008). Implementation issues on planning control according to the provision of Town and Country Planning Act 1976 in Malaysia. Journal of Architecture and Urban Design,14, 47-58
Dunse, N., Thanos, S. & Bramley, G. (2013). Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences. Journal of Property Research.30 (3), 221 -238.
Foo, L. H.R., & Wong, C. (2014). Planning for housing development in Malaysia: developers’ response to the regulatory policy framework. International Planning Studies. 19 (2). 192- 209.
Gurran, N., Gilbert, C. & Phibbs, P. (2013). Planning and the housing market: measuring regulatory difference and implications for explaining supply and affordability trends. 7th Australasian Housing Researchers’ Conference. 6th-8th February 2013
Gurran, N., & Whitehead, C. (2011). Planning and affordable housing in Australia and the UK: a comparative perspective. Housing Studies. 26 (7-8), 1193- 1214.
Ismail, W & Said, I. (2015). Integrating the community in urban design and planning of public spaces: a review in Malaysian cities. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 168. 357-364
Jae, H.K. (2011). Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: a literature review. Journal of Planning Literature. 26 (1). 35-47
Lin, Y. & Meulder, B. (2012). A conceptual framework for the strategic urban project approach for the sustainable redevelopment of “villages in the city” in Guangzhou. Habitat International. 3. 380-387
Maliene, V. & Malys, N. (2009). High- quality housing- a key issue in delivering sustainable communities. Building and Environment Journal. 44 (2). 426-430.
Mohd, I, Ahmad, F. & Aziz, WA. (2009). Exploiting town planning factors in land development: case study of urban housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of Facilities Management. 7 (4), 307 – 318.
Mohd, I, Arby, E. & Ramly, A. (2007). Urban housing development: town planning issues. Journal of Malaysian Institute of Planners, 43-59.
Mohd, T. & Alias, G. (2011). The role of housing planning practices in contributing towards housing oversupply. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 59. 767-775.
Mohit, M., Ibrahim, M. & Rashid, Y.R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International. 34 (1). 18-27
Monkkonen, P. (2013). Urban land use regulations and housing markets in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia on the importance of enforcement. Land Use Policy Journal. 34. 255-264
Osman, M, Bachok, S, Bakri, N.I, & Harun, N. (2014). Government delivery system: effectiveness of local authorities in Perak, Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 153. 452-462.
Othman, A. (2006). Developer’s strategies in dealing with planning control: its impact on the urban housing development. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate. 1(2). 7-15.
Rameli. A. (2007). Application of method of content analysis and perception survey in evaluating the effectiveness of planning system in managing housing supply. Proceedings of the 2nd Post Graduate Seminar on Research of Built Environment 2007. March 6. Faculty of Built Environment. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rameli. A. (2009). Land use planning system and housing development. Ph.D. Thesis. UTM, Malaysia
Rameli, A. & Aman, R. (2011). Ineffectiveness of planning control and its implications to housing oversupply. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 1-15
Yakob, H., Yusof, F., & Hamdan, H. (2012). Land use regulations towards sustainable urban housing: Klang Valley conurbation. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 68. 578-589
Yakob, H., Yusof, F., & Hamdan, H. (2015).Stakeholders’ perception on effectiveness of housing planning and control in urban areas: a preliminary survey. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 168. 289-301.