Does Permeability Promote Social Cohesion

Authors

  • Aldrin Abdullah School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali Department of Architecture, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
  • Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki School of Humanities, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • Azizi Bahauddin School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i10.83

Keywords:

Permeability, social cohesion, road type, residential neighbourhood

Abstract

Understanding environmental conditions of neighbourhoods can play a critical role in maintaining social interactions among residents. This research is carried out to assess the effect of street permeability on the degree of social cohesion among residents in a residential neighbourhood in Penang, Malaysia. A total of 250 households participated in the study. The findings indicate that permeability can account for a significant proportion of the variance in residents’ social cohesion. Residents living in less permeable streets are more likely to have a high social cohesion with their neighbours. The results further support the defensible space concept which advocates closed streets.

Keywords: Permeability; social cohesion; road type; residential neighbourhood

eISSN 2398-4295 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

 

 

References

Abdullah, A., Hedayati Marzbali, M., Woolley, H., Bahauddin, A., & Maliki, N. Z. (2014). Testing for Individual Factors for the Fear of Crime Using a Multiple Indicator-Multiple Cause Model. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 20(1), 1-22.

Abdullah, A., Hedayati Marzbali, M., Tilaki, M. J. M., & Bahauddin, A. (2015). The Influence of Permeability on Social Cohesion: Is it Good or Bad? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 261-269.

Appleyard, D., & Lintell, M. (1972). The environmental quality of city streets: the residents' viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38(2), 84-101.

Beavon, D. J. K., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. Crime prevention studies, 2, 115-148.

Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1985). Social cohesiveness, territoriality, and holiday decorations: The influence of cul-de-sacs. Environment and behavior, 17(5), 539-565.

Greenberg, S. W., & Rohe, W. M. (1984). Neighbourhood design and crime: a tale of two perspectives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(1), 48-61.

Hedayati Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2016). The effectiveness of interventions in the built environment for improving health by addressing fear of crime. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2015.12.002.

Hillier, B. (2004). Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International, 9(1), 31-45.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 89-111.

Mayo, J. M. (1979). Effects of street forms on suburban neighboring behavior. Environment and behavior, 11(3), 375-397.

Morrow-Jones, H. A., Irwin, E. G., & Roe, B. (2004). Consumer preference for neotraditional neighborhood characteristics. HOUSING POLICY DEBATE-WASHINGTON-, 15(1), 171-202.

Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space; crime prevention through urban design New York: Macmillan.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Poyner, B. (1983). Designing against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space. London: Butterworths.

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.

Shu, C. F. (1999). Housing Layout and Crime Vulnerability. Paper presented at the Space Syntax Second International Symposium, Brasilia, Brazil.

Shu, C. F. (2009). Spatial Configuration of Residential Area and Vulnerability of Burglary: Case Studies from UK and Taiwan. Paper presented at the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm.

Ziegler, E. H. (2007). American Cities, Urban Planning, and Place Based Crime Prevetion. Paper presented at the pantheon sorbonne university of paris 1, France, Paris.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-13

How to Cite

Abdullah, A., Marzbali, M. H., Tilaki, M. J. M., & Bahauddin, A. (2018). Does Permeability Promote Social Cohesion. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 3(10), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i10.83

Issue

Section

Articles